MortiES’ Premium: Now offering 30 day free trial period! & track record

Written by BostonWealth
October 4th, 2009 at 7:09 pm

TRY THE THIRTY DAY FREE TRIAL PERIOD!!!

Subscribers to MortiES’ Premium Content will have access to analyses of the e-Mini S&P (ES) authored by “Mortie”. Analyses and comments will be posted at times during the day and/or night that is deemed timely by Mortie. Specific buy and sell recommendations will not be given.

Monthly subscription runs for a month from the day you subscribe, regardless of the day you start,  and is not prorated.  So if you start your subscription on the 4th day of a month, after your trial period,  it will run until the 4th day of the next month and then will automatically be renewed.

null

Click to see MortiES' Track Record ~ Week of October 26, 2009

Click to see MortiES' Track Record ~ Week of October 19, 2009

Click to see MortiES' Track Record ~ Week of October 12, 2009

Click to see MortiES' Track Record ~ Week of October 5, 2009

Click to see MortiES' Track Record

Click to see what Subscribers are saying

Feb. 8th 2010: Continued Weakness – Red Monday

Written by PUGridiron
February 8th, 2010 at 11:28 pm

5:30 pm EST:  A very weak Monday with no follow-through to the upside to confirm Friday’s late day buying.  Today ws the first red Monday I can remember in a while.  It’s possible the SP-500 is tracing out a very weak B-leg corrective with a-B and b-B completed.  The maximum now for c of B looks like about 1085.  But I’m not so sure of that count at this point.   I think wave 4 of (5) of A may have completed today at 1071 and wave 5 of (5) of A is now getting underway that will reach levels below 1045.  The 1030 area is still a solid target for the completion of this wave, whether it be just A or all of A-B-C of the corrective off 1150.  The 200-day SMA has now climbed up to 1020 and still rising, so as shown in my daily chart.  The 1030 area will be point of confluence for the 200-day SMA and horizontal support by the end of this week.  Also notice how the 13-day EMA that crossed over the 34-day is now acting as a cap on upward price movement.  The 13-day EMA sits at 1087 today and rapidly falling.  Any pop up towards the 13-day should be sold.  And until the upper pink down channel is breached to the upside, there pops should continue to be sold.  The trend is still down and I believe it likely to continue through most of this week.

15-min (EOD):

Daily 13 vs 34-day EMA (EOD):

Why is it so important to watch the “indicators”?

Written by Biiwii
February 8th, 2010 at 4:11 pm

Why is it so critical to watch indicators like leading market ratios, sentiment, the ratio of gold to silver, money supply, etc.?  Well, one look at this nominal SPX chart provides an answer; trying to figure out the nature of a similar downturn to that of last June/July devolves into a mere guessing game if all you go by is straight technicals on the SPX daily chart.

SPX dumped the neckline of a small H&S topping pattern, spent 4 days below it and then said screw this, time for hope and greed to make a triumphant return.  It was right around that point that I began to realize that my projections for the duration of Hope ‘09 might need to be expanded.  Boy, did hope and denial ever expand… right into this latest break. 

But it is more complex than simply watching indicators.  The gold-silver ratio for example rose strongly in June/July (implying market downside), but broke out of its weekly downtrend line for only one week before falling back.  Current weekly GSR has now completed two full  weeks of breakout from its most recent downtrend line, has constructed a good looking MACD and formed an inverted H&S bottom pattern.

Yes I know, you have to be a total geekoid get-a-lifer to be into this stuff.  Well, if you knew me in real life you would see that I am not very cool and do not display a dynamic personality.  But I am into this shit because – call me weird – I just love to make money or at the least, preserve capital and remain as detached from convention as possible.  It’s the secret recipe of succeeding in the financial markets.

Sorry for the self-involved last paragraph but you must understand, you, the blog reader are all I have got (aside from NFTRH subscribers who actually assign a monetary value to my opinions) when it comes to communicating these things.  In real life nobody but nobody wants to hear it.  Now that’s weird if you ask me.  Most people want to make and protect money, but when it comes to the necessary work to do so, it’s not happening.

Thus ends another technical analysis post that jumps the track.

Feb. 7th, 2010: Primary & Alternate Counts Revisted

Written by PUGridiron
February 6th, 2010 at 4:31 pm

10:00 am EST:  OK.  I wanted to have one more run at this for the weekend.  After looking at everything again, I’m not changing my primary count.  It remains the same as it’s been for awhile.  Wave [3] peaked at 1101 and wave [5] of P1 peaked at 1150.  One thing that caught my eye about wave [3], that I did not mention before, is that wave 5 of [3] was likely and ending diagonal.   If you look at the RSI (relative strength index) for the dialy chart, you will notice the RSI peaked in early August 2009 when the SP-500 hit 1018 (38% re-tracement of 1575 to 666 drop).  A lot of bears were all excitied back then and called a top.  They were confused when the index dropped to 976 and reversed course.  And no one seemed to understand the overlapping waves that ensued, as new highs of 1040 and 1080 were made.  It’s cleaer to me now that I have recounted wave [3], that after wave 3 of [3] peaked at 1018, we had an ending diagonal for wave 5 of [3] that carried the index to 1101.  It fits perfectly with the RSI peak for wave 3 of [3] at 1018 (see SP-500 with RSI Chart below).

Now after the 1101 peak in mid-October is where things got more interesting.  Again the bears got all excited as the SP-500 quickly dropped from 1101 to 1029, breaking through the previous highs of 1080 and 1040.  They were again calling for a top and saying 1101 would not be seen again as “P3 had begun”.  But look what happened in early November.   At 1029 the index reversed course again, before falling below the critical 1018 level.  The bears were in total disbelief and forced to run for cover.   What ensued is a strong rally to 1113 and yet another new high.  The bulls and bears slugged it out for control during most of Nov-Dec and a consolidation rectangle pattern formed.  Eventually the bulls won out and pushed the index to a new high of 1150 in early Jan 2010.  This move from 1029 can be counted as a 5-wave complete [5] of P1.  And that is my primary count.  It can also be counted as an a-b-c, more on that later.

So where does this leave us?  We’ve had a very hard sell-off of 105 points from 1150 down to 1045 as of Friday Feb 5th.  This drop can be counted as a 5-wave complete A of P2 (red count).  And that is my primary count.   As of late in the day on Friday, we could be starting the counter-trend B-leg of P2, which could re-trace to between 1085 and 1115.  When the C-leg resumes down, we are looking at a target in the 950 to 970 area (38% retrace of 666 to 1150) to complete this P2 move down.  There are levels of 50% retrace (908) and 62% retrace (850) that we also need to keep in mind if the down trend strengthens over the coming weeks and 966 is breached.  For now, i like the 950 to 970 target, as it matches up with a lot of support from the June 2009 wave [1] peak.

Now for the alternative count that I have been discussing recently.  The alternative count is that P1 top has not been made.  It’s possible that the SP-500 has traced out a large running flat since late Oct 2009 until now.   In the running flat the b-leg retraces much more that the a-leg and the c-leg will fail to reach the depth of the a-leg.  The b-leg is also 3-wave count or a-b-c.  If you look at what has transpired since the Oct wave [3] peak at 1101, we have an a-leg of 1101 to 1029 (72 points) and b-leg of 1029 to 1150 (121 points)..  Therefore the b-leg is much larger than the a-leg and the b-leg can be easily counted as a 3-wave more.  And if this current drop ends here at 1045, it counts as 5-wave move of 105 points and it fits the running flat pattern well.  Look at the purple labels for the a-b-c running flat alternate count for wave [4] of P1.   Notice how this alternate wave [4] count “runs” across the P1 bull channel lines in order to correct the primary up trend.  The correctoin is done mostly through time and a small amout of price drop.  This is very typical of a wave [4] action.   Also notice how this type of running flat alternates nicely with the simple a-b-c zig-zag for wave [2] and satifsies a very important Elliott wave concept of alternation.  So in the alternate count we should begin a wave [5] now or very shortly if a little more correction in time or price is needed.  The target area for wave [5] is in the 1180 to 1230 area, with a maximum target of 1261.  Also, realize that the 62% retracement of 1575 to 666 is at 1230.  Thus, the goal of P1 maybe to tag this 1230 level.  It’s very typical for the next Fib level to be targeted once the previous one is breached.  And the 50% Fib was breached at 1120.  Also realize that if the 1029 level is breached that the “running flat” wave [4] alternate count is dead and we are likely in the primary count discussed above.  So we have a line in the sand at 1029 to watch closely the next few days to a week.

Another thing in the alternate counts favor is a broadening top pattern.  As mentioned yesterday, I do like to look for patterns in the price formation.  And this does not have to do with Elliott wave counts and should not viewed as Elliott wave labels.  So if you look at the yellow labels begining with “a” 1113, “b” at 1083, and “c” at 1150 and “d” at 1045, you will see a very classic symmetric broadening top formation.  This formation would point to an e-leg headed toward the 1180 to 1200 are.   Does this mean it will play-out and confirm the althernate count?  No, but I do find it very interesting.

And finally, as I showed after the close on Friday, the McClellan Oscillator is showing positive divergence similar to the June-July correction and thus could be signaling a strong bounce up in the markets this coming week.

Good luck trading this week.  It should continue to be volatile in the markets.  Go Saints !!!

SP-500 McCellan Oscillator (EOD 2-5-10):

SP-500 60-min Chart (EOD 2-5-10):

SP-500 Daily Primary and Alternate Counts (EOD 2-5-10):

SP-500 Daily Price vs RSI (EOD 2-5-10):

Feb. 3, 2010

Written by Bala
February 6th, 2010 at 12:35 am

Grueling day…….
Qs – Relative Strength; opened inside yesterday’s range and quickly moved to test recent swing highs.  Around lunch time Qs broke out and above prior high and successfully held on on subsequent test. (AAPL, BIDU and GOOG were strong today)
IWM – Relative Weak,  Open in mid of prior day’s range, quickly proceeded  to test previous high but was unsuccessful; IWM were unable to hold above 200MA on 5min and dropped briefly below yesterday’s lows; Closed back in Mid Range. 
SPY – Range trade but overall performance was soft; dropped below overnight range three times but eventually closed back inside. 
USD Strong
Oil Neutral
10 YR Up

Materials,  Energy  Financials, Health Care were the most ‘flacid’ on the day while Industrials, Cons. Staples, and Utilities held their own for the most part.  Cons. Discretionary outperformed. 

ES dropped through its overnight range three times.  I suspect the above average weakness of the IWMs and above average strength of the Qs, put the SPYs right in the middle and some ’softness’ (i.e. not adhering to rigid price levels) should be expected.  Furthermore, set today’s trade against the backdrop of a possible trend change (suggesting the past few days are only a bounce seeing as the Russell2K and S&P rejected the underside of their 50DMA; noticeable selling into strength from many of the stocks I scalp, and an over all lower relative volume); and what it appears to be a more fragile economy (shocking), some market tepidness would be a reasonable reaction. 

*However, there was also positive sentiment divergence and improving internals for much of the day.  The Qs showed relative strength today and they’ve been a market leader for some time. 
 So………….. Where this takes us? Who the f_ck knows.   

By the way; volume has picked up dramatically during the 10:00CST – 11:00 Time Frame.  Those two periods have been running ‘hotter’ relative volume for the past 7 days in a row. 

Strap Up

Written by j0sh1ngU
February 4th, 2010 at 2:01 am

Yesterday, I used currencies to spot the top in ES and in currencies. Tomorrow I have one thing to say, and that is sit tight on bearish side…..

Feb. 3, 2010

Written by Bala
February 3rd, 2010 at 10:52 pm

Grueling day…….
Qs – Relative Strength; opened inside yesterday’s range and quickly moved to test recent swing highs.  Around lunch time Qs broke out and above prior high and successfully held on on subsequent test. (AAPL, BIDU and GOOG were strong today)
IWM – Relative Weak,  Open in mid of prior day’s range, quickly proceeded  to test previous high but was unsuccessful; IWM were unable to hold above 200MA on 5min and dropped briefly below yesterday’s lows; Closed back in Mid Range. 
SPY – Range trade but overall performance was soft; dropped below overnight range three times but eventually closed back inside. 
USD Strong
Oil Neutral
10 YR Up

Materials,  Energy  Financials, Health Care were the most ‘flacid’ on the day while Industrials, Cons. Staples, and Utilities held their own for the most part.  Cons. Discretionary outperformed. 

ES dropped through its overnight range three times.  I suspect the above average weakness of the IWMs and above average strength of the Qs, put the SPYs right in the middle and some ’softness’ (i.e. not adhering to rigid price levels) should be expected.  Furthermore, set today’s trade against the backdrop of a possible trend change (suggesting the past few days are only a bounce seeing as the Russell2K and S&P rejected the underside of their 50DMA; noticeable selling into strength from many of the stocks I scalp, and an over all lower relative volume); and what it appears to be a more fragile economy (shocking), some market tepidness would be a reasonable reaction. 

*However, there was also positive sentiment divergence and improving internals for much of the day.  The Qs showed relative strength today and they’ve been a market leader for some time. 
 So………….. Where this takes us? Who the f_ck knows.   

By the way; volume has picked up dramatically during the 10:00CST – 11:00 Time Frame.  Those two periods have been running ‘hotter’ relative volume for the past 7 days in a row. 

Feb. 2, 2010

Written by Bala
February 3rd, 2010 at 1:16 am

Before it was abundantly clear we’d be having an powerful Trending Day…..(Tech, Materials were lagging and NASDAQ Internals were less convincing), I wasn’t exactly sure what was taking place during the 10:00 CST period.  There was a lot of volume transacting and I initially suspected that level may act as resistance (see the last chart of this post for additional reasoning). Once the rest of the market caught up with the S&P and Russell 2K, the picture became a bit more clear.

I spent more time scalping equities today so I may have missed some of the day’s developments. One scalp in particular would have been a heart stopper had I not spent the last 8 months visualizing the very situation.  So instead of crapping my pants outright, instead I begrudgingly soiled them……lol….

Perhaps this explains the large volume during the 10:00 CST period (Price ran into the 200MA)
 

Wrong once, Wrong twice shame on me, but the bull ends tomorrow

Written by j0sh1ngU
February 2nd, 2010 at 7:20 pm

I am looking at currencies and I think this will mark the top…. regardless top is near…. I think tomorrow will prove me right

AUD

EUR

ES prediction tad old….. but….

Feb. 1, 2010

Written by Bala
February 1st, 2010 at 10:43 pm

Healthy Internals & Sentiment ( I assume spurred by short covering) made today difficult to have a short bias (even though I caught myself whispering a few times, “wtf?”).  While I don’t watch T.V. (when trading), a trader friend mentioned Obama was speaking during the morning session.  I tend to stay out of these conversations but judging how screwy the morning structure was, I’m more apt to subscribe to my buddy’s suspicions. 

I hate being wrong

Written by j0sh1ngU
February 1st, 2010 at 5:51 pm

Anyways I see ES testing between 86-94 ES and topping out. I am using EUR/USD 1.3946 as a level to watch and Aud/usd .894. Key ES level is 89, I think we begin selloff starting tomorrow as a lot of charts are broken and did their retest today. My first target is in 1060s