<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The discussion of a big picture or can we go higher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostonwealth.net/2009/11/07/the-discussion-of-a-big-picture-or-can-we-go-higher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostonwealth.net/2009/11/07/the-discussion-of-a-big-picture-or-can-we-go-higher/</link>
	<description>Stock market commentary, fundamental &#38; technical analyses on the financial markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.bostonwealth.net/2009/11/07/the-discussion-of-a-big-picture-or-can-we-go-higher/comment-page-1/#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bostonwealth.net/?p=7810#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>Interesting analysis. I agree with you about this not being P2. In fact I am not convinced that this bear should be labeled as impulsive at all. The 2007-2009 decline could also just be Primary A and we could be in Primary B right now. Also the decline from 2007-2009 could be a completed A-B-C and the bull market could have resumed. The thing about E-wave is that there is always an alternate count that is often recognized to be valid only after the fact. It is all just about probabilities. That is why I like to look to other methods to help me determine which outcome is the most probable. IMO the most probable count is that we are in Primary B right now.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis. I agree with you about this not being P2. In fact I am not convinced that this bear should be labeled as impulsive at all. The 2007-2009 decline could also just be Primary A and we could be in Primary B right now. Also the decline from 2007-2009 could be a completed A-B-C and the bull market could have resumed. The thing about E-wave is that there is always an alternate count that is often recognized to be valid only after the fact. It is all just about probabilities. That is why I like to look to other methods to help me determine which outcome is the most probable. IMO the most probable count is that we are in Primary B right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

